![]() |
|
Home | Help | Status | Forums | Glossary | Account
|
log in |
Message boards : Pirate Applications : Starboard 5.15
Author | Message |
---|---|
Aaaarrrrrgh, and me seen it first! | |
ID: 6490 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kalessin wrote: Aaaarrrrrgh, and me seen it first! Blast! Dragon's eyes are 2nd to none. ____________ ![]() Click and enter your name for your BOINC Statistics | |
ID: 6492 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
AAarrrrrgggg! | |
ID: 6500 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
The validator seems to be off, in spite of being shown as running. | |
ID: 6503 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kalessin wrote: AAarrrrrgggg! Yes, it can be quite jerky. I'm watching it now on an old Thinkpad. It runs smoother on newer graphics hardware. The animation seems to behave somewhat different on this hack than for others. For most of the others if the hardware is old and slow then the screensaver runs slower, but you still get all the frames. This one seems to look directly at the clock and compute the frame it should show right now. So on an old machine with little hardware acceleration you get single frames in the animation but they are not close together and don't morph from one to the other well. (I should look more closely at the code to confirm it, but that's my best guess right now.) On a newer box with hardware graphics acceleration it should be a smooth animation, with some nice effects (the logo/sign fade in and out, moves back, etc). As with earlier screensavers in the starboard series, I didn't write it, I only made small adjustments to get it to run under BOINC, and on Windows. The hacks that come from XScreenSaver were written by a wide variety of authors, and each has it's own little quirks. ____________ -- Eric Myers "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats | |
ID: 6505 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kalessin wrote: AAarrrrrgggg! I'll say. My poor crappy onboard graphics coupled with an aging (probably overheating) P4 makes for a series of disconnected images. It's a little bit better if it's not full screen. Other than that, nothing remarkable to report. Windows XP Pro; 5.10.20. ____________ Kathryn :o) The BOINC FAQ Service The Unofficial BOINC Wiki The Trac System | |
ID: 6506 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Wormholio wrote: On a newer box with hardware graphics acceleration it should be a smooth animation, with some nice effects (the logo/sign fade in and out, moves back, etc). I would like to remark that my graphics card indeed is very old (about 8 months!) (geforce 7600 Gt and in other cases working well) ____________ Dragons can fly because they don't fit into pirate ships ![]() | |
ID: 6513 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
So can anybody see the screensaver scrolling smoothly, as intended? Or do all pirates have old, crappy graphics cards? :-) | |
ID: 6520 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Wormholio wrote: So can anybody see the screensaver scrolling smoothly, as intended? Or do all pirates have old, crappy graphics cards? :-) It's a lot smoother on my Linux host. It's more jumpy when the window is maximized. Processor: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz (2 CPUs) Memory: 2038MB RAM Card name: Mobile Intel(R) 945GM Express Chipset Family Manufacturer: Intel Corporation Chip type: Intel(R) GMA 950 Display Memory: 224 MB Dedicated Memory: 0 MB Shared Memory: 224 MB Current Mode: 1280 x 800 (32 bit) (60Hz) ____________ Kathryn :o) The BOINC FAQ Service The Unofficial BOINC Wiki The Trac System | |
ID: 6526 | Rating: 1 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Yep, only crappy graphic cards here. | |
ID: 6529 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I also am having very jumpy graphics that appear as static images rather than flowing movement. | |
ID: 6537 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
C2D T7200, idle ATI X1600 (i.e. no other changes on screen), plenty of memory, Starboards' graphics thread has higher priority (4-6) than other threads, which consume CPU (means other Boinc apps with prio 1). | |
ID: 6538 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Graphics are very jumpy on my laptop.. 1.6G Pentium M, 512M ram, Radeon 9600 mobility integrated card... XP SP2. | |
ID: 6541 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Very jumpy on my poor old P4 with a GeForce FX 5200. What I see is pretty, though... | |
ID: 6547 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Hi me Cap'n, i hope you turned it off only to improve the graphics???!!! | |
ID: 6553 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
FWIW, I finally found and installed the package that has this particular xscreensaver in it. It ran a lot smoother than when it was running through BOINC. | |
ID: 6561 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Kalessin wrote: Hi me Cap'n, i hope you turned it off only to improve the graphics???!!! Indeed, that's what I did. I looked at the rendering loop at how it determines the time of the next frame. It uses a Unix routine called getttimeofday(,). Since this does not exist on Windows I had already written a replacement, but I'm suspicious that my cobbled together version wasn't doing it quite right. I'll replace it and try another round. That could be the explanation for the slideshow effect, not that we all have crappy graphics cards. ____________ -- Eric Myers "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats | |
ID: 6562 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
KSMarksPsych wrote: FWIW, I finally found and installed the package that has this particular xscreensaver in it. It ran a lot smoother than when it was running through BOINC. Maybe not 5.16, but I'm open to suggestions. ____________ -- Eric Myers "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats | |
ID: 6563 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Wormholio wrote: I looked at the rendering loop at how it determines the time of the next frame. It uses a Unix routine called getttimeofday(,). Since this does not exist on Windows I had already written a replacement, but I'm suspicious that my cobbled together version wasn't doing it quite right. Hey Capt'n, on Win you can use GetTickCount(), it returns the number of milliseconds that have elapsed since the system was started. I think that for our ten minute pirate equipment the time range and resolution are just fine. ____________ Peter .-) ![]() | |
ID: 6565 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Pepo wrote:
That's good to know, but BOINC has its own dtime() function which does just what we need in Windows. There was indeed a problem with the "fake" version of getttimeofday() on Windows, and that would explain the jumpy slideshow effect. But since I only have crappy graphics cards I can only say that it looks better than before, but not smooth. I hope it's smoother for those with better hardware. Enjoy. ____________ -- Eric Myers "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats | |
ID: 6566 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
I missed the batch of units on my laptop.. but will hopefully get some later on and will check it out! | |
ID: 6567 | Rating: 0 | rate:
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Message boards : Pirate Applications : Starboard 5.15
Home | Help | Status | Forums | Glossary | Account
|